COURT

Court Meeting:	[Insert the date of the Court Meeting]

Document Title:	[Insert document/paper title]

Responsible:	[Insert full name(s) and job title(s) of authors of the paper. In the case of a report from the Committee, it should be the Chair]

Executive Summary:

[The executive summary should be comprehensive enough to allow members to fully engage with the topic and emphasise the key information that Court needs to consider. It should be tailored for a lay member audience, clearly defining acronyms and explaining higher education terminology. Additionally, if questions arise, the summary must provide sufficient context to facilitate meaningful discussion. It should not simply direct the reader to an attached paper]

Action Required:

☐	FORMALLY APPROVE

☐	FOR DISCUSSION

☐	TO NOTE/FOR INFORMATION

Resource Implications:	[What are the resource implications (including financial implications) of doing/not doing. If the paper includes a request for funding, state where funding is coming from.]
Risk and Assurance:	[If the purpose of this paper is to provide assurance regarding compliance requirements, state this explicitly. Additionally, identify any connections to risk registers and explain how the risk is impacted.]
University Strategy:	[Clearly indicate which of the University’s strategies the paper is addressing.]
Sustainability Implications/Assessment:	[Does the proposal have any implications for Glasgow Green?]
Student Experience:	[How will it support and/or enhance the student experience/student life.]
Equality Considerations:	[EDI considerations should be listed here, including if an Equality Impact Assessment has been undertaken].
Supporting Information:	[If there are appendices/supplementary documents that provide additional details please insert URL here. Do not expect these to be essential reading for the main discussion]

Classification:	☐	OPEN

☐	CONFIDENTIAL

☐	STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL

Note: If paperwork includes information that is considered personal under Data Protection Legislation of Data Protection Laws, it should be highlighted clearly that this should not be shared. If any information is to be redacted before publishing, Authors of papers are responsible and should supply a redacted copy to the Clerk of Court for publication and if required, clearly identify a timeframe for publication.

[If Confidential or Strictly Confidential, provide a brief rationale for the classification]

.